Abstract
Aim: People from different social backgrounds live in cities, which are residential zones with high population densities and continuous characteristics (1). Political, economic, and cultural factors have contributed to changes in the meanings and purposes of cities across time. These elements have an impact on how cities are run and how residents interact with each other. The process of globalization is seen as a factor hastening urban change. The globalization process, in addition to being a force that unites various cultures, has the potential to cause the loss of a society's unique characteristics and the emergence of societies that are identical to one another if its adverse consequences are not addressed. Cities start to lose their distinctive identities as a result of this situation (2, 3). Cities' original structure suffers as societies lose their own identities and uniqueness. The globalization process' standardization effects have a negative impact on urban culture and may result in the development of a consuming culture that is standardized economically (4). In terms of structure, many cities today resemble one another because of the look. Original structures are starting to give way to uniform and comparable constructions. This situation is harmful to city culture, especially to the ideals referred to as the urban spirit. While the cities are more similar to one another, the adoption of a rapid and monotonous lifestyle by its inhabitants, as opposed to their original lifestyles, has resulted in the creation of many harmful currents. These factors have also had an impact on the foods of today's population, who lead fast-paced lives and seldom have time for social interaction. Fast food has become a popular habit that is detrimental to both local cuisine culture and health (5). A few movements have formed in an effort to conserve lost and vanishing customs, regional ways of life, and historic city identities. In order to counteract the negative effects of globalization, the Slow Food movement was founded as a non-profit civil society movement (6). The basic tenet of the Slow Food movement is that everyone may have access to healthy, ethical, and sustainable food for the world (7). The requirements and expectations of responsible customers have also changed, depending on the goals of the slow-food movement. These customer demands have led to certain developments in the travel and tourist industry. Businesses that implement service policies in line with the needs of visitors looking to escape the stress of everyday life and enjoy novel experiences have begun to emerge as tourist attraction hubs (8). Because of this, lodging and dining establishments in tourist areas operate by putting the culture of the local food first. Because it is easy to conclude that food and beverages offer appealing experiences when visitor encounters are investigated.
Nowadays, tourists are beginning to place more value on learning about the locals and their culture while choosing which tourist activities to take part in. In this regard, the significance of gastronomic travel is gradually growing. Local food and beverages stand out as components that show visitors the region's true character, historical background, and cultural history (9). In this environment, numerous tourist sites have begun to use various marketing techniques to transform their culinary culture into a tourist attraction. In a context of increasing tourism competitiveness, activities are being conducted that fall under the category of gastronomic tourism. Local tasting tours have become more popular recently among these activities, as can be shown (10). Managers that promote destinations by highlighting the diversity and wealth of the regions organize the gastronomy routes they have chosen under the heading of local tasting tours through tour operators (11). It is thought that in order to sustain the advantages of local tasting tours for a longer period of time, it is critical to accept and put into practice the concepts of eco-gastronomy and Slow Food. Because it is believed that preserving these values is the only way to stop the global cultural and environmental destruction. It is essential to give sustainability principles top priority in every field in order to avoid unwanted effects. The food and tourist industries can benefit economically and help to preserve local characteristics by operating in accordance with sustainability principles. For this reason, it is hoped that by promoting them through local tasting tours, the strong relationship between the aims of the Slow Food movement and sustainable gastronomic tourism can be advantageous to tourist destinations.
Method: People are the primary focus of phenomena like the Slow Food movement and the local tasting tours investigated in this study. The systematic descriptive compilation approach of qualitative research designs was used to comprehend the activities in which individuals are participating. In the approach of systematic review, information is gathered by conducting as much research as is practical on the topic under investigation, and then the information is thoroughly examined. Systematic reviews decrease prejudice because they are impartial. A systematic review is regarded as a scientific technique for compiling the literature as well (12). During the study's data gathering phase, the Google Scholar database, a number of websites, academic journals, and books were employed for this purpose. Using the information collected, an analysis of the current state of the Slow Food movement's projects and tasting tours was conducted, and recommendations were made. It is anticipated that the study will benefit academic scholars, destination managers, tour operators, and associated literature in this field.
Results: The Slow Food movement is primarily concerned with the conversation between diners at the dinner table and the preservation of food culture (13). The goal of gastronomy, on the other hand, is to maintain regional flavors while also catering to customer preferences and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the culinary tradition. The objectives of the Slow Food movement and the field of gastronomy are complementary. Based on this similarities, the research looked at how local tasting tours and the Slow Food movement are related.
Gastronomy tours are package deals that provide all that gastronomy travelers are looking for in terms of access and experiences. The unique selling point of local flavor tours is how they combine the gastronomy with all of the area's other historical and natural attractions to appeal to tourists (14). On the other side, the goal of the Slow Food movement is to make healthy, ethical food accessible to everyone. As a result, it works on projects that promote taste education, biodiversity preservation, and gastronomic traditions. Activities like the Terra Madre food net, slow fish, slow wine, and slow cheese are done as part of the Slow Food movement. These initiatives and the gastronomic excursions run by the Slow Food movement are very similar. It is expected that the advantages of local tasting tours will last for a longer time and that they will play a more active role by embracing and putting the ideas of Slow Food and eco-gastronomy into practice. The evaluation conducted in this context led to the conclusion that the majority of research on the topic found that local gastronomy are an appealing factor for tourists and inspire them to learn about the regional culinary traditions. Tasting tours therefore appear to be crucial to the growth and promotion of rural communities. Organizing gourmet tours in line with the principles of sustainable tourism, eco-gastronomy, and the Slow Food movement is beneficial to the region's culinary culture, economy, and environment (15).
Conclusion: As a result, it can be claimed that the Slow Food movement and local tasting tours share a foundation and have a harmonic design. The establishment of tasting tours in areas where the Slow Food movement is popular would help to achieve the expected objectives. More tourists who are interested in the topic will participate in this experience as a result of the introduction of the regions that adhere to the Slow Food or Cittaslow concept. By embracing the Slow Food concept, it will be possible to stop the detrimental impacts of tourism and protect the local population and its values.
Nowadays, tourists are beginning to place more value on learning about the locals and their culture while choosing which tourist activities to take part in. In this regard, the significance of gastronomic travel is gradually growing. Local food and beverages stand out as components that show visitors the region's true character, historical background, and cultural history (9). In this environment, numerous tourist sites have begun to use various marketing techniques to transform their culinary culture into a tourist attraction. In a context of increasing tourism competitiveness, activities are being conducted that fall under the category of gastronomic tourism. Local tasting tours have become more popular recently among these activities, as can be shown (10). Managers that promote destinations by highlighting the diversity and wealth of the regions organize the gastronomy routes they have chosen under the heading of local tasting tours through tour operators (11). It is thought that in order to sustain the advantages of local tasting tours for a longer period of time, it is critical to accept and put into practice the concepts of eco-gastronomy and Slow Food. Because it is believed that preserving these values is the only way to stop the global cultural and environmental destruction. It is essential to give sustainability principles top priority in every field in order to avoid unwanted effects. The food and tourist industries can benefit economically and help to preserve local characteristics by operating in accordance with sustainability principles. For this reason, it is hoped that by promoting them through local tasting tours, the strong relationship between the aims of the Slow Food movement and sustainable gastronomic tourism can be advantageous to tourist destinations.
Method: People are the primary focus of phenomena like the Slow Food movement and the local tasting tours investigated in this study. The systematic descriptive compilation approach of qualitative research designs was used to comprehend the activities in which individuals are participating. In the approach of systematic review, information is gathered by conducting as much research as is practical on the topic under investigation, and then the information is thoroughly examined. Systematic reviews decrease prejudice because they are impartial. A systematic review is regarded as a scientific technique for compiling the literature as well (12). During the study's data gathering phase, the Google Scholar database, a number of websites, academic journals, and books were employed for this purpose. Using the information collected, an analysis of the current state of the Slow Food movement's projects and tasting tours was conducted, and recommendations were made. It is anticipated that the study will benefit academic scholars, destination managers, tour operators, and associated literature in this field.
Results: The Slow Food movement is primarily concerned with the conversation between diners at the dinner table and the preservation of food culture (13). The goal of gastronomy, on the other hand, is to maintain regional flavors while also catering to customer preferences and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the culinary tradition. The objectives of the Slow Food movement and the field of gastronomy are complementary. Based on this similarities, the research looked at how local tasting tours and the Slow Food movement are related.
Gastronomy tours are package deals that provide all that gastronomy travelers are looking for in terms of access and experiences. The unique selling point of local flavor tours is how they combine the gastronomy with all of the area's other historical and natural attractions to appeal to tourists (14). On the other side, the goal of the Slow Food movement is to make healthy, ethical food accessible to everyone. As a result, it works on projects that promote taste education, biodiversity preservation, and gastronomic traditions. Activities like the Terra Madre food net, slow fish, slow wine, and slow cheese are done as part of the Slow Food movement. These initiatives and the gastronomic excursions run by the Slow Food movement are very similar. It is expected that the advantages of local tasting tours will last for a longer time and that they will play a more active role by embracing and putting the ideas of Slow Food and eco-gastronomy into practice. The evaluation conducted in this context led to the conclusion that the majority of research on the topic found that local gastronomy are an appealing factor for tourists and inspire them to learn about the regional culinary traditions. Tasting tours therefore appear to be crucial to the growth and promotion of rural communities. Organizing gourmet tours in line with the principles of sustainable tourism, eco-gastronomy, and the Slow Food movement is beneficial to the region's culinary culture, economy, and environment (15).
Conclusion: As a result, it can be claimed that the Slow Food movement and local tasting tours share a foundation and have a harmonic design. The establishment of tasting tours in areas where the Slow Food movement is popular would help to achieve the expected objectives. More tourists who are interested in the topic will participate in this experience as a result of the introduction of the regions that adhere to the Slow Food or Cittaslow concept. By embracing the Slow Food concept, it will be possible to stop the detrimental impacts of tourism and protect the local population and its values.
References
Gürpınar, E., (1996). Kent ve çevre sorunlarına bir bakış. Der Yayınları.
Kiper, P. (2004). Küreselleşme sürecinde kentlerimize giren yeni tüketim mekânları ve yitirilen kent kimlikleri. Planlama TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Yayını, 4(30), 14-18
Radstrom, S., (2011). A Place Sustaining Framework for Local Urban Identity: An Introduction and History of Cittaslow. Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 1(1), 90-113. http://www.ijpp.it/index.php/it/article/viewFile/8/8.
Tomlinson, J., (2004). Küreselleşme ve kültür. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Kuter, N. & Ünal, H. E. (2009). Sürdürülebilirlik kapsamında eko turizmin çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyokültürel etkileri. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 146-156. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/159667.
Özgürel, G., & Avcıkurt, C. (2018). Yavaş yemek (Slow Food) hareketinin yerli turistler (akademisyenler) tarafından incelenmesi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 568, 587. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2018.324.
Slow Food International, (2022). Slow Food. https://www.slowfood.com/, [Erişim: 03 Eylül 2022].
Küçükkömürlüler, S., Şirvan, U. N. B., & Sezgin, A. C. (2018). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de gastronomi turizmi. Uluslararası Turizm, Ekonomi ve İşletme Bilimleri Dergisi (IJTEBS), 2(2), 78-85. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijtebs/issue/42202/507858.
Yıldız, Ö. E. (2016). Turistik ürün olarak gastronomi. H. Kurgun, & D. Bağıran Özşeker (Ed.), İçinde, Gastronomi (Kavramlar-Uygulamalar-Uluslararası Mutfaklar-Reçeteler) ve Turizm (s. 25-44). Detay Yayıncılık.
Kervankıran, İ. & Çuhadar, M. (2014). Turizm rotalarının oluşturulmasında coğrafi bilgi sistemlerinin önemi. Proceedings of III. Disiplinlerarası Turizm Araştırmaları Kongresi (s. 576-589), 04-05 Nisan 2014, Aydın.
Aksakallı, Z., & Bayraktar, Y. (2018). Gastronomi rotaları ve turları. İçinde, A. Akbaba & N. Çetinkaya (ed.), Gastronomi ve yiyecek tarihi (s. 211-222). Detay Yayıncılık.
Taşkır, N. (2022). Corona virüsün medikal turizm üzerine etkileri: Betimsel tipte nitel sistematik derleme [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
Güven, E. (2011). Yavaş Yemek’ten Yavaş Medya’ya hızlı tüketime dair bir çözüm önerisi. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 7(1), 113-121. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/josc/issue/19023/200590.
Corigliano, M. A. (2002). The route to quality: Italian gastronomy networks in operation. Tourism and gastronomy, 166.
Jung,H., Ineson,E., & Miller, A., (2014). The Slow Food Movement and sustainable tourism development: a case study of Mold, Wales. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(4), 432 – 445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-01-2014-0001.
Sepúlveda, L. & Petrini, C. (2018). Mutluluğa dair bir düşünce. Gezgin, Ş. (Çev.). Can Yayınları.
Aliyeva, N., & Kurgun, A. (2020). Slow Food hareketinin gastronomi turizminin sürdürülebilirliği ile ilişkisi: Foça örneği. Gastroia: Journal of Gastronomy and Travel Research, 5(2), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.32958/gastoria.926470.
Bucak, T., & Turan, Ö. (2016). Bölge turizmine yeni akımların etkisi: Gökçeada Slow Food örneği. Journal of Yaşar University, 11(43), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.66409.
Sünnetçioğlu, S., & Özkök, F. (2017). Güzel, özgün ve iyi yemeğin peşindeki yolculuk: gastronomi. Journal of Awareness, 2(3), 585-596. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328335066_IYI_GUZEL_OZGUN_YEMEGIN_PESINDEKI_YOLCULUK_GASTRONOMI.
Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi temelli sosyal hizmet araştırmaları dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
Mayer, H. & Knox, PL. (2006). Slow Cities: Sustainable Places in a Fast World. Journal Of Urban Affairs, 28(4), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00298.x.
Keskin, E. B. (2012). Sürdürülebilir kent kavramına farklı bir bakış: yavaş şehirler (Cittaslow). Paradoks Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 8(1), 81-99. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/paradoks/issue/16354/171237.
Tosun, E. K. (2013). Yaşam kalitesi ekseninde şekillenen alternatif bir kentsel yaşam modeli: yavaş kentleşme hareketi. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 215- 237. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338448438_YASAM_KALITESI_EKSENINDE_SEKILLENEN_ALTERNATIF_BIR_KENTSEL_YASAM_MODELI_YAVAS_KENTLESME_HAREKETI.
Cittaslow Türkiye. (b.t.). https://cittaslowturkiye.org/tr/, [Erişim: 26 Nisan 2022].
Sırım, V. (2012). Çevreyle bütünleşmiş bir yerel yönetim örneği olarak “sakin şehir” hareketi ve Türkiye’nin potansiyeli. Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(4), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v1i4.100.
Tetik, N. (2012), Turist rehberlerinin ekoturizm alanındaki yeterlilikleri: Doğu Karadeniz örneği [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi.
Can, E. (2013). Turizm destinasyonlarında sürdürülebilir turizmin sürdürülebilir rekabet açısından değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4, 23-40. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/istjss/issue/17490/183021.
Altanlar, A., & Kesim, G. A. (2011). Sürdürülebilir turizm planlaması için yöre halkı ve yerli turistlerin davranış ve beklentilerini anlamaya yönelik bir araştırma; Akçakoca örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevre Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1501/Csaum_0000000050.
Güneş, S. G., (2020). Sorumlu Turizm. İçinde, Güneş, S. G. ve Özdemir Akgül, (Ed.), Sorumlu Turizm (s. 12). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Uyar, H., & Zengin, B. (2015). Gastronomi turizminin alternatif turizm çeşidi olarak değerlendirilmesi bağlamında gastronomi turizm indeksinin oluşturulması. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(17), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.808
Özkaya, F.D., Sünnetçioğlu, S., & Can, A. (2013). Sürdürülebilir gastronomi turizmi hareketliliğinde coğrafi işaretlemenin rolü. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 1(1), 13-20. https://dspace.balikesir.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12462/4523/ayse-can.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Aydoğdu, A., & Mızrak, M. (2017). Yöresel yemeklerin sürdürülebilirliğinde standart reçetelendirmenin önemi: Kastamonu mutfağı örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20), 366-394. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.341471.
Bratec, M. (2008). Aiming towards sustainable (tourism) development: the case of the slow food movement and its impacts in Slovenia. Assignment for the course of Sustainable Tourism Development. University of Southern Denmark.
Bertella, G. (2011). Knowledge in food tourism: the case of Lofoten and Maremma Toscana. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2010.489638.
Kızılırmak, İ., Ofluoğlu, M. & Şişik, L. (2016). Türkiye’de uygulanan gastronomi turları rotalarının web tabanlı analizi ve değerlendirmesi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 4(Special issue1), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2016.35.
Ryu, K. & Jang, S. (2006). Intention to experience local cuisine in a travel destination: the modified theory of reasoned action. Journal Hospitality Tourism Research, 30(4), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348006287163.
Birdir, K., & Akgöl, Y. (2015). Gastronomi turizmi ve Türkiye'yi ziyaret edenlerden yabancı turistlerin gastronomi deneyimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 57-68. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/355402.
Lopez, X. A. A. & Martin, B. G. (2006). Tourism and quality agrofood products: an opportunity for the Spanish countryside. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 97(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00510.x.
Çakır, A., Çiftçi, G. & Çakır, G. (2017). Trakya turizm rotası projesi: lezzet rotası üzerine bir değerlendirme. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 5(Special issue2), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2017.123.
Emekli, G. (2006). Coğrafya, kültür ve turizm: kültürel turizm. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 15(1-2), 51-59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344412813_COGRAFYA_KULTUR_VE_TURIZM_KULTUREL_TURIZM.
Soyak, M. (2013). Uluslararası turizmde son eğilimler ve Türkiye’de turizm politikalarının evrimi. Marmara Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (4), 1-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/marusad/issue/394/2763.
Üzülmez, M., & Akdağ, G. (2020). Gastronomi turizminde yeni tur rotaları: 3A (Adana-Antep-Antakya) lezzet bölgesi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 4, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2020.669.
Özgüneş, R. E. & Bozok, D. (2017). Gastronomi tur ve durakları. D. Bozok, C. Avcıkurt, M. Doğdubay, M. Sarıoğlan & G. K. Girgin (Ed.), İçinde, Gastronomi üzerine araştırmalar (ss. 57-66). Detay Yayıncılık.
Everett, S. (2016). Food and drink tourism: principles and practice. London, England: Sage Publications.
Yüncü, H. R. (2010). Şarap turizmi bölgelerinin rekabet edebilirliğine yönelik bir model önerisi: Kapadokya örneği [Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
Işkın, M. (2020). Bir destinasyonun gastronomi turizmine uygunluğunun belirlenmesi üzerine keşifsel bir araştırma [Doktora Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
Slow-wine (b.t.). https://www.slowwineusa.com/, [Erişim: 03 Mayıs 2022].
Kesici, M. (2012). Kırsal turizme olan talepte yöresel yiyecek ve içecek kültürünün rolü. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2012(2), 33-37. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kmusekad/issue/10213/125502.
Özer, Y. (2013). Destinasyon pazarlamasında gastronominin rolü [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi].
Çataklı, S. (2021). Gastronomi turizminin destinasyon markalaşmasına etkisi: Trabzon ilinde bir araştırma [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
İskender, A. (2020). Çay turizmi: Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesinde uygulanabilirliği üzerine değerlendirme. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(3), 1958-1971. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2020.643
Aksoy, M., & Sezgi, G. (2015). Gastronomi turizmi ve Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi gastronomik unsurları. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(3), 79-89. https://www.jotags.org/Articles/2015_vol3_issue3/2015_vol3_issue3_article8.pdf.
Dilsiz, B. (2010). Türkiye’de gastronomi ve turizm (İstanbul örneği) [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
Can, İ. İ., & Ağcakaya, H. (2019). Somut olmayan kültürel miras kapsamında mutfak kültürünün sürdürülebilirliği: Türkiye’deki gastronomi müzeleri örneği. Gastroia: Journal of Gastronomy and Travel Research, 3(4), 788-804. https://doi.org/10.32958/gastoria.582778.
Oleatrium Zeytin ve Zeytinyağı Müzesi (b.t.). https://www.oleatrium.com/, [Erişim: 03 Mayıs 2022].
Kutman Şarapları (b.t.). http://www.kutmansaraplari.com/verify, [Erişim: 04 Mayıs 2022].
Özkaya, F. D., Özkaya, M. T., Tunalıoğlu, R., Bayar, R., & Tunalıoğlu, E. (2018). Anadolu’da zeytin ve zeytinyağlı yemekler rotası. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 6(3, Special), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2018.253.
Kara, T., & Atasoy, E. (2020). Dünya'nın ilk cittaslow (yavaş şehir) adası: Gökçeada'nın turizm potansiyeli. In Global Science and Innovations, 117-124. https://avesis.uludag.edu.tr/yayin/d42be5fe-fa93-4b50-87f4-a96697813ff3/dunyanin-ilk-cittaslow-yavas-sehir-adasi-gokceadanin-turizm-potansiyeli.
Çavuşoğlu, M., & Çavuşoğlu, O. (2018). Gastronomi turizmi ve Gökçeada lezzet rotası. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(Ek1), 347-359. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/guntad/issue/38617/447965.
Bilişli, A. (2012). Gıda Teknolojisi. Sidaş Medya Yayınları.
Güneş, S. G., & Nizamlıoğlu, A. (2018). Konya’nın geleneksel peynirlerinin gastronomi turizmi açısından önemi. Cittaslow Türkiye, 28.
Kars Peynir Rotası. (2022). http://karspeynirrotasi.com/, [Erişim: 29 Ağustos 2022].
TÜRKPATENT (Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu). (2022). https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/, [Erişim: 29 Ağustos 2022].
Güzeler, N., & Koboyeva, F. (2020). Doğu Anadolu bölgesinde üretilen peynir çeşitleri. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 172-184. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1220652.
Kars Peynir Müzesi. (2022). https://www.karspeynirmuzesi.org/, [Erişim: 29 Ağustos 2022].
Eko-müze Zavot. (2022). https://www.ekoharita.org/project/zavot-ekomuze/, [Erişim: 29 Ağustos 2022].
Gelecek Turizmde. (2022). https://www.gelecekturizmde.com/, [Erişim: 29 Ağustos 2022].
Tefler, J.D. (2001). From a wine tourism village to the regional wine route: an investigation of the compatitive advantage of embedded clusters in Niagara, Canada, Tourism Recreation Research, 26(2), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2001.11081340.
Albayrak, A. (2013). Alternatif turizm. Detay Yayıncılık.
Trakya Bağ Rotası, (2022). https://www.trakyabagrotasi.com/, [Erişim: 29 Ağustos 2022].
Akdağ, G. (2015). Trakya bağ rotasını takip eden yerli turistlerin şarap turizmi deneyimleri. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(4), 3-11. https://www.jotags.org/Articles/2015_vol3_issue4/2015_vol3_issue4_article1.pdf.
Çavuş, Ş., Kaya, B., & Demirtaş, B. (2019). Sürdürülebilir turizm açısından slow food hareketine bakış ve Türkiye uygulamaları. Internatıonal Black Sea Coastline Countries Symposium, Batumi, 2-5 Mayıs, 364-375. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343237178_Surdurulebilir_Turizm_Acisindan_Slow_Food_Hareketine_Bakis_Ve_Turkiye_Uygulamalari.
Çerman, M. (2019). İstanbul’un Lüfer bayramı Kuzguncuk’ta kutlanıyor, http://www.mugecerman.com/tag/slow-food-turkiye, [Erişim: 16 Ağustos 2022].
Slow Cheese Bodrum. (2022). http://www.slowcheesebodrum.com, [Erişim: 02 Nisan 2022]
Ayvalık Belediyesi. (2022). http://ayvalik.bel.tr, [Erişim: 02 Nisan 2022].
Terra Madre Anatolia (2022). https://terramadreanatolia.com/, [Erişim: 03 Mayıs 2022].
Yıldız, M., & Yılmaz, M. (2020). Gastronomi alanındaki trendlere bir bakış. Sivas Interdisipliner Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, (5). http://sita.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/57733/781834.
Çalışkan, O. (2013). Destinasyon rekabetçiliği ve seyahat motivasyonu bakımından gastronomik kimlik. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 1(2), 39-51. https://www.jotags.org/Articles/2013_vol1_issue2/2013_vol1_issue2_article4.pdf.
Gökdeniz, A., Erdem, B., Dinç, Y., & Çelik, S. U. (2015). Gastronomi turizmi: Ayvalık’ta yerli turistler üzerinde görgül bir araştırma. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 3(1), 14-29. https://dspace.balikesir.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12462/4024.
Yenipınar, U., Köşker, H., & Karacaoğlu, S. (2014). Turizmde Yerellerin Önemi ve Coğrafi İşaretleme: Van Otlu Peyniri. The Journal of Tourism and Gastronomi Studies, 13, 23. https://www.jotags.org/Articles/2014_vol2_issue2/2014_vol2_issue2_article2.pdf.
Cömert, M., & Özkaya, F. D. (2014). Gastronomi turizminde Türk mutfağının önemi. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 2(2), 62-66. https://www.jotags.org/Articles/2014_vol2_issue2/2014_vol2_issue2_article7.pdf.
Eatwith (2023). https://www.eatwith.com/blog/category/things-to-do-and-activities-to-try-when-traveling/. [Erişim: 18 Ocak 2023].
Quan, S., & Wang, N. (2004). Towards a structural model of the tourist experience: An illustration from food experiences in tourism. Tourism management, 25(3), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00130-4.
Bukla Tur. (2022). https://bukla.com/, [Erişim: 02 Nisan 2022].
Jolly Tur. (2022). https://www.jollytur.com/, [Erişim: 02.04.2022].
Tatil Budur (2022). https://www.tatilbudur.com/, [Erişim: 02 Nisan 2022].
Tempo Tur. (2022). https://tempotur.com.tr/, [Erişim: 02 Nisan 2022].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Toros University Journal of Food, Nutrition and Gastronomy